Stewart v. Trevizo
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-39855
STACY NICOLE STEWART,
Petitioner-Appellant, v.
JACK ARMONDO TREVIZO,
Respondent-Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY
Dustin K. Hunter, District Judge
New Mexico Legal Aid, Inc.
Sarah V. Coffey
Albuquerque, NM for Appellant
Jack Armondo Trevizo
Wichita, KS
Pro Se Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BOGARDUS, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge JANE B. YOHALEM, Judge
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.