Sharp v. Sharp
Sharp v. Sharp
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-39682 BARBARA B. SHARP, Petitioner-Appellee, v. LYNN S. SHARP, Respondent-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Jane C. Levy, District Judge Walther Family Law PC Gretchen Mary Walther Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Michael Danoff Albuquerque, NM for Appellant MEMORANDUM OPINION BOGARDUS, Judge. {1} Respondent appeals seeking reversal of the district court’s order of attorney fees. [CN 1] In our notice of proposed disposition, we proposed to summarily affirm the district court. [CN 3] Petitioner filed a memorandum in support, which agreed with our proposed affirmance. Respondent, however, failed to file a memorandum in opposition to our proposed disposition. Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein and in our notice of proposed disposition, we affirm. See Hennessy v. Duryea, 1998-NMCA-036, ¶ 24, 124 N.M. 754, 955 P.2d 683 (“Our courts have repeatedly held that, in summary calendar cases, the burden is on the party opposing the proposed disposition to clearly point out errors in fact or law.”); State v. Johnson, 1988-NMCA-029, ¶ 8, 107 N.M. 356, 758 P.2d 306 (explaining that when a case is decided on the summary calendar, an issue is deemed abandoned when a party fails to respond to the proposed disposition of that issue). {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge WE CONCUR: JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.