New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2022

State v. Anaya

State v. Anaya
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided March 15, 2022 · KRISTINA BOGARDUS; ZACHARY A. IVES; SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON
State v. Anaya

Opinion

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-39203

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

RICARDO ANAYA,

Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF ROOSEVELT COUNTY

Donna J. Mowrer, District Judge

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General

Santa Fe, NM for Appellee

Ricardo Anaya

Portales, NM

Pro Se Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BOGARDUS, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge

WE CONCUR: ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge

SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.