Gonzales v. Salcido
Gonzales v. Salcido
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-39613 DEBRA GONZALES and EDDIE GONZALES, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ELI SALCIDO, Defendant-Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LINCOLN COUNTY John P. Sugg, District Judge Montgomery & Andrews, P.A.
Kari E. Olson Santa Fe, NM Alexandra J. Bobbit, P.C.
Alexandra J. Bobbit Ruidoso, NM for Appellants Law Office of Matthew Holt, P.C.
Matthew P. Holt Las Cruces, NM for Appellee MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Chief Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge WE CONCUR: KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.