Doe v. N.M. State Univ. Bd. of Regents
Doe v. N.M. State Univ. Bd. of Regents
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-40269 JANE DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF REGENTS, Defendant-Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY Mary W. Rosner, District Court Judge Bruce E. Thompson Law Firm, P.C.
Bruce E. Thompson Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Mynatt Martinez Springer P.C.
Haley R. Grant Las Cruces, NM for Appellee MEMORANDUM OPINION IVES, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge WE CONCUR: JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Chief Judge KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.