State v. Martinez
State v. Martinez
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-41598 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JACOB A. MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY Drew D. Tatum, District Court Judge Raúl Torrez, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Law Offices of Blake J. Dugger, P.C.
Blaker J. Dugger Hobbs, NM for Appellant MEMORANDUM OPINION DUFFY, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance, in part, and summary reversal, in part, was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance, in part, and summary reversal, in part, has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED, IN PART, REVERSED, IN PART. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge WE CONCUR: JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Chief Judge ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.