Lusk v. Lusk
Lusk v. Lusk
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-41536 KELLI LYNN LUSK, Petitioner-Appellee, v. JOSHUA CORY LUSK, Respondent-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY Dustin K. Hunter, District Court Judge Sanders, Bruin, Coll & Worley, P.A.
Anna Casey Martin Roswell, NM for Appellee Lauren E.A. Truitt, P.C.
Lauren Temple Ruidoso, NM for Appellant MEMORANDUM OPINION ATTREP, Chief Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Chief Judge WE CONCUR: SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge KATHERINE A. WRAY, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.