Harmon v. Fortenberry
Harmon v. Fortenberry
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-41944 LORRAINE HARMON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ADAM FORTENBERRY, Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY Matthew J. Wilson, District Court Judge Lorraine Harmon Edgewood, NM Pro Se Appellee Robert Richards Santa Fe, NM for Appellant MEMORANDUM OPINION BACA, Judge. {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. REVERSED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
GERALD E. BACA, Judge WE CONCUR: MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.