State v. Martinez
State v. Martinez
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-41869 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARTHUR MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY David P. Reeb, District Court Judge Raúl Torrez, Attorney General Felicity Strachan, Assistant Solicitor General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Kathleen T. Baldridge, Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Appellant MEMORANDUM OPINION ATTREP, Chief Judge. {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. Appellee has filed a notice with this Court informing us that it will not be filing a memorandum in opposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed. REVERSED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Chief Judge WE CONCUR: MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.