State v. Escobedo
State v. Escobedo
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-42044 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KAREN ESCOBEDO, Defendant-Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY Conrad F. Perea, District Court Judge Raúl Torrez, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM, NM Serena R. Wheaton, Assistant Solicitor General Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Kathleen T. Baldridge, Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Appellee MEMORANDUM OPINION HENDERSON, Judge. {1} Summary reversal and remand was proposed for the reasons stated in the second notice of proposed summary disposition. Appellee has filed a memorandum in support of that disposition. Appellant has filed a notice with this Court informing us that they oppose the proposed summary disposition. Accordingly, we rely on the reasoning contained in our second notice of proposed disposition. REVERSED and REMANDED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge WE CONCUR: J. MILES HANISEE, Judge KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.