Strickland v. Madden Sales and Service, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO MONTY L. STRICKLAND and CARA STRICKLAND, Plaintiffs, vs. Civ. No. 19-918 MV/JFR MADDEN SALES AND SERVICE, Inc., a Texas corporation, Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar, filed February 10, 2020. Doc. 38. Objections were due by no later than February 24, 2020. The parties have not filed any objections. The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. U.S. v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10th Cir. 1996).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 38) are ADOPTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Doc. 14) is DENIED, for the reasons set forth in the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition.
Uf , MARTHYW AZQUEZ ' United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.