Redhouse v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO HAROLD LEE REDHOUSE, JR, Petitioner, v. Civ. No. 19-814 MV/GJF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte in connection with Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 habeas proceeding. Several mailings to Petitioner have been returned as undeliverable.

See ECFs 3-4. It appears that Petitioner has not advised the Court of his new address, as required by D.N.M. LR-Civ. 83.6. See also Bradenburg v. Beaman, 632 F.2d 120, 122 (10th Cir. 1980) (stating that “‘[i]t is incumbent on litigants, even those proceeding pro se, to follow the federal rules of procedure” and emphasizing that “[t]he same is true of simple, nonburdensome local rules” (citations omitted)).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, no later than March 20, 2020, Petitioner shall update his address or show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Failure to timely comply may result in dismissal of this action without further notice.

SO ORDERED.

ff serge A /] /OVAgGAA E BLE GREGORY J. FOURATT UNITEDSTATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE