District Court, D. New Mexico, 2020

Perea v. Social Security Administration

Perea v. Social Security Administration
District Court, D. New Mexico · Decided August 27, 2020
Perea v. Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CHRISTINE PEREA, Plaintiff, V. No. CV 19-888 CG ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO AWARD ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (the “Stipulated Motion”), (Doc. 25), filed August 21, 2020. The Court, having reviewed the Stipulated Motion under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, finds the Stipulated Motion is well-taken and attorney fees shall be awarded, made payable to Plaintiff but mailed to Plaintiffs attorney in the amount of $3,874.50. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) (EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that if Plaintiff's counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiff's counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986).

IT IS SO ORDERED. (200-2 THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.