District Court, D. New Mexico, 2021

Chipps v. Social Security Administration

Chipps v. Social Security Administration
District Court, D. New Mexico · Decided April 28, 2021
Chipps v. Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO JOSEPH CHIPPS, Plaintiff, V. No. CV 20-794 JB/CG ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE THIS MATTER is before the Court for scheduling. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff shall file a Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency with Supporting Memorandum on or before June 28, 2021; (2) Defendant shall file a Response on or before August 30, 2021; (3) Plaintiff may file a Reply on or before September 13, 2021; ' (4) All supporting memoranda filed pursuant to this Order shall cite ONLY the relevant portions of the transcript or record in support of assertions of fact and shall cite authority in support of propositions of law; and (5) All requests for extensions of time altering the deadlines set in this Order shall be made through a motion to the Court. If the parties concur in seeking an extension of time, they shall submit a stipulated proposed order to the Court for approval.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The parties have fully briefed the Commissioner's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 16), which includes briefing on Plaintiff's constitutional claim raised pursuant to Seila Law, LLC v. Consumer Fin. Prot.

Bureau, U.S. ___, 141 S.Ct. 2183, 207 L.Ed.2d 494 (2020). See (Doc. 16); (Doc. 21); (Doc. 24); (Doc. 25). As such, the parties shall limit the briefing set forth herein only to the substantive issues on review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.