District Court, D. New Mexico, 2021

Trujillo v. Social Security Administration

Trujillo v. Social Security Administration
District Court, D. New Mexico · Decided June 30, 2021
Trujillo v. Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO FRANCENE LORRAINE TRUJILLO, Plaintiff, v. No. CV 20-167 CG ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AWARD ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2412 (West) With Supporting Memorandum (the “Motion”), (Doc. 36), filed June 16, 2021; and Commissioner Andrew Saul’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, (the “Response”), (Doc. 39), filed June 29, 2021. In his Response, the Commissioner “notifies the Court that he does not oppose th[e] [M]otion.” Id. at 1. The Court, having reviewed the parties’ briefing and noting the Motion is unopposed, finds the Motion is well-taken and shall be granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded $6,068.00 in attorney fees pursuant to EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, made payable to Plaintiff but mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) (EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff’s counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiff’s counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.