District Court, D. New Mexico, 2021

Safetree Consulting v. Adams

Safetree Consulting v. Adams
District Court, D. New Mexico · Decided May 13, 2021
Safetree Consulting v. Adams

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ________________________ SAFETREE CONSULTING and DAMON CHARLES WILLIAMS, Petitioners, v. No. 1:21-cv-00317-KWR-JFR

MATTHEW PATRICK ADAMS, Respondent.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL THIS MATTER is before the Court following Petitioner’s failure to prosecute this action.

Pursuant to the Order to Cure Deficiency (Doc. 4) entered on April 9, 2021, Petitioner was ordered to prepay the $402.00 filing fee, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the entry the Court’s order.

Petitioner failed to prepay the $402.00 filing fee, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within the thirty (30) days as directed by the Court. The Court will therefore dismiss this action without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and comply with Orders. See Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n. 3 (10th Cir. 2003) (“Rule 41(b) … has long been interpreted to permit courts to dismiss actions sua sponte for a plaintiff's failure to prosecute or comply with the … court’s orders.”).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and the Court will enter a separate judgment CLOSING THIS CASE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

KEA WAIGGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.