District Court, D. New Mexico, 2021

Edwards v. Social Security Administration

Edwards v. Social Security Administration
District Court, D. New Mexico · Decided November 3, 2021
Edwards v. Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO LULA EDWARDS, Plaintiff, v. No. 2:21-CV-102 KRS KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE This matter is before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff filed a Complaint on February 8, 2021, appealing the final decision of the Social Security Administration, which denied her claim for benefits. (Doc. 1). On August 2, 2021, the Court set a briefing schedule and ordered Plaintiff to file a Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency Decision no later than October 1, 2021. (Doc. 19). Pursuant to Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time, the Court extended Plaintiff's deadline to October 31, 2021. (Docs. 20, 21). Plaintiff has neither filed a Motion to Remand nor requested an extension of time to do so. A district court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with a court order.

See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-31 (1962); Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that on or before November 10, 2021, Plaintiff shall either file a Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency Decision with a supporting memorandum of law, or file a response to this Order showing cause why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Resin Simeosea “Ei SWEAZEA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.