District Court, D. New Mexico, 2023

Lucero v. Social Security Administration

Lucero v. Social Security Administration
District Court, D. New Mexico · Decided March 7, 2023
Lucero v. Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO SHANE ELI LUCERO, Plaintiff, vs. Civ. No. 22-00693 JHR KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT The Court, having reviewed the parties’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Doc. 16), HEREBY ORDERS that attorney fees be, and hereby are, awarded under the EAJA, payable to Plaintiff but mailed to Plaintiffs attorney in the amount of $1,058.50 in attorney fees and $402.00 in filing fees. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) (EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, if Plaintiff's counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiffs counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986).

SIGNED March 7, 2023.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JERRY H. RITTER

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.