Bastian v. Jaramillo
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
THOMAS O. BASTIAN
Plaintiff, v. Civ. No. 21-350 WJ/JFR HEATHER JARAMILLO et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (“PFRD”), filed June 21, 2023 (Doc. 55), recommending that the Court deny Plaintiffs Motion Requesting Leave to Joinder Joinder [sic] Additional Plaintiff (“Motion”) (Doc. 21). Objections to the PFRD were due by no later than July 5, 2023, with three additional days permitted for mailing. See Doc. 55. Plaintiff has not filed any objections, and the deadline has expired. The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s PFRD waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10" Cir. 1996).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s PFRD (Doc. 55) is ADOPTED. Plaintiffs Motion is thereby DENIED.
WILLIAM P. JOHNSON
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.