Garcia v. Social Security Administration
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
ALEX GARCIA,
Plaintiff, vs. CIV NO. 2:23-CV-00112-KRS
KILOLO KIJAKAZI,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
Defendant’s Stipulated Motion for Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) is GRANTED.
Defendant shall pay Plaintiff $7,500.00 in attorney fees. Payment of this amount shall constitute a complete release from and bar any and all claims Plaintiff may have relating to EAJA fees in connection with this action. However, the EAJA award is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s attorney’s right to seek attorney fees pursuant to Social Security Act § 206(b), 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(c)(1) (2006).
Under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2528–29 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). This Court therefore orders the EAJA fees to be paid to Plaintiff. If, after receiving the Court’s EAJA fee order, the Commissioner (1) determines that Plaintiff has properly assigned his right to EAJA fees to his attorney; (2) determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program; and (3) agrees to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, then the EAJA fees will be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney. However, if there is a debt owed under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiff's attorney at the following address:
KONOSKI & PARTNERS, P.C.
180 Tices Lane
Suite 103, Building B
East Brunswick, NJ 08816
IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of August, 2023.
KEVIN R. SWEAZEA
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Submitted by:
ALEXANDER M.M. UBALLEZ
United States Attorney
MANUEL LUCERO
Assistant United States Attorney /s/ Michelle C. Verdis
MICHELLE C. VERDIS
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
Approved on 8/15/2023 by: /s/ Bryan Konoski'
BRYAN KONOSKI
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF ' Plaintiffs counsel provided consent to Defendant’s counsel to add his electronic signature.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.