Greathouse v. Comerica Bank
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
TERRY GREATHOUSE,
Plaintiff, v. No. 1:24-cv- 1030 DLM/JFR COMERICA BANK,
Defendant.
ORDER SETTING NEW TRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte under the Court’s inherent power to manage its docket. See Bunn v. Perdue, 966 F.3d 1094, 1099 (10th Cir. 2020) (“District courts are afforded great discretion regarding control of the docket and parties.”) (quoting United States v. Orozco, 916 F.3d 919, 925 (10th Cir. 2019)); SEC v. Mgmt. Sols., Inc., 824 F. App’x 550, 553 (10th Cir. 2020) (‘[A] district court has the inherent power to ‘manage [its] own affairs so as to achieve orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.’”) (quoting Dietz v. Bouldin, 579 U.S. 40, 45 (2016)). Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the previously scheduled trial scheduling conference. In its place, the Court will conduct a telephonic trial scheduling conference on January 15, 2025, at 10:30 a.m. MST. Counsel and pro se parties shall call 855-244-8681 and enter access code 2314 983 7724 to be connected to the telephonic status conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED. . Zz pews Z Meg
DAMIANL.MARTINEZ
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.