District Court, D. New Mexico, 2025

Garcia v. Social Security Administration

Garcia v. Social Security Administration
District Court, D. New Mexico · Decided March 4, 2025
Garcia v. Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

ANITA A. G.,

Plaintiff, v. Civ. No. 24-964 GBW LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of the

Social Security Administration1,

Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, with Memorandum in Support. Doc. 14. The parties have stipulated to an award of $602.40 in attorney fees and $0.00 in costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (“EAJA”).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $602.40 in attorney fees and $0.00 in costs under the EAJA. The EAJA fees will be paid to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiff’s attorney. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 595-98 (2010); Manning v. Astrue, Leland Dudek is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil procedure, Leland Dudek should be substituted for Commissioner Martin O’Malley as the defendant in this suit. 510 F.3d 1246, 1255 (10th Cir. 2007); Brown v. Astrue, 271 F. App’x 741, 743-44 (10th Cir. 2008) (unpublished).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff's attorney ultimately receives an award of attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), said attorney must refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). The award is subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(c)(1). fit

CHIEF UNIV¥D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Presiding by Consent

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.