Ahmed Shedid Mohamed Ghouneim v. Dora Castro, et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

AHMED SHEDID MOHAMED GHOUNEIM, Petitioner, v. No. 2:26-cv-00954-KG-JMR DORA CASTRO, et al., Respondents.

ORDER TO ANSWER Petitioner Ahmed Shedid Mohamed Ghouneim filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on March 30, 2026. (Doc. 1). The Clerk of Court provided notice of completion of electronic service on March 30, 2026. (Doc. 2). Petitioner requests that the Court issue an order directing Respondents to Show Cause why the petition should not be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Doc. 1 at 14. Petitioner contends that the Court should order Respondents file a response within three days. Id. Having reviewed the Petition, the Court concludes that the claims must be resolved on a full record, including an answer from Respondents. Therefore, Petitioner’s request that the Court issue an order to show cause is denied. See Teran v. Bondi, 2025 WL 3158150, at *2 (D.N.M.) (“Habeas Rule 4 grants a district judge discretion to set a time for respondents to answer or otherwise respond to the habeas petition.”). The Court orders Respondents to file an answer within 10 business days of entry of this Order. The Clerk shall send a courtesy copy of this Order and the Petition to the U.S. Attorney’s Office at the following email address: [email protected].

/s/Kenneth J. Gonzales___________________ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

• Please note that this document has been electronically filed. To verify its authenticity, please refer to the Digital File Stamp on the NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing) accompanying this document.

Electronically filed documents can be found on the Court’s PACER public access system.