Alicia Consuelo T. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security...

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ALICIA CONSUELO T., Plaintiff, v. Civ. No. 25-334 KWR/GJF FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION THIS MATTER is before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition on Plaintiff’s Motion to Reverse and Remand, which recommends the Court DENY the Motion and DISMISS the case with prejudice. Dkt. No. 23. The PFRD notified the parties of their ability to file objections within fourteen days (in this case, no later than August 21, 2026). Having reviewed the PFRD and noting that the parties filed no objections to it by the deadline, the Court concurs with the PFRD.1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that (1) the PFRD is ADOPTED; (2) Plaintiff’s Motion to Reverse and Remand (Dkt. No. 16) is DENIED; (3) the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED; and (4) the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

____/S/__________________________________ KEA W. RIGGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 “A party’s objections to [a PFRD] must be both timely and specific to preserve an issue for de novo review by the district court or for appellate review.” U.S. v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). The parties’ failure to timely object to the PFRD thus waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. In re Key Energy Res. Inc., 230 F.3d 1197, 1199–1200 (10th Cir. 2000); One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d at 1059.