State v. Dunlap

New Mexico Supreme Court
State v. Dunlap, 242 P. 449 (N.M. 1925)
31 N.M. 275
PER CURIAM.

State v. Dunlap

Opinion of the Court

Each of the defendants in the above-entitled causes was convicted under sections 1 and 2, c. 118, Laws of 1923, which, as we have just held in State v. Armstrong, No. 2947, 242 P. 440, not as yet [officially] reported, are violative of section 18, art. 4, of the Constitution of this state. The judgment in each of said causes must therefore be reversed and remanded, with direction to discharge the accused.

Reference

Full Case Name
State v. Clay Dunlap, Same v. A.S. Stewart, Same v. Claude Wells, Same v. E.A. Shedoudy, Same v. Dominic Cunico, Same v. Robert L. Bledsoe, Same v. J.H. Singer
Status
Published