1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA R. WAYNE JOHNSON Case No.: 2:18-cv-00969-APG-GWEF 4 Plaintiffs Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. STEVEN GRIERSON and BRANDI WENDEL, 7 Defendants 8 9 On July 11, 2019, Magistrate Judge Foley recommended that I dismiss this case because 10}| plaintiff R. Wayne Johnson did not file an amended complaint by the given deadline and did not 11}|respond to Judge Foley’s order to show cause. ECF No. 11. Johnson did not file objections nor did he file an amended complaint. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation.

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 15|| made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 17|| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Foley’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 11) is accepted and plaintiff’ s complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 21 DATED this 29th day of July, 2019. 22 fe ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE