1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Eric Chatman, Case No. 2:18-cv-01312-JAD-CWH 5 Plaintiff v. Order Adopting Report and 6 Recommendation and Dismissing and Closing Case Mirage Hotel & Casino Resort, et al., 7 Defendants [ECF No.6] 8 9 10 Pro se plaintiff Eric Chatman brings this civil-rights actionagainst private companies 11 Mirage Hotel & Casino, Chivas Regal Corporation, Circus Circus Hotel & Casino, the 12 Budweiser Company,and the StratosphereHotel & Casinoseeking millions ofdamages for 13 injuries he claims he sustained in 2010 or earlier. Because personal-injury claims like this are 14 governed by a two-year statute of limitations, and Chatman filed this action many years after that 15 limitations period ran, Magistrate JudgeHoffman recommends that Idismiss this lawsuit with 16 prejudice as time barred.1 The deadline for objections to that recommendation was July 25, 17 2019, and no party has filed an objection to it or moved to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o 18 review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are 19 filed.”2 20 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 21 [ECF No. 6] is ADOPTEDin full; 22 1 ECF No. 6. 23 2 Schmidt v. Johnstone,

(D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn,

(1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003). 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this case is DISMISSED with prejudice as time- 2\| barred. 3 The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY and CLOSE 4) THIS CASE. 5 Dated: July 29, 2019

os 6 is US. DistrictYudge J oanita,) orsey 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23