Crebassa v. Rape Crisis Center

District Court, D. Nevada

Crebassa v. Rape Crisis Center

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Sarah Crebassa, Case No. 2:17-cv-02273-JAD-CWH 5 Plaintiff v. Order Adopting Report and 6 Recommendation and Dismissing Case as Delusional and Frivolous Rape Crisis Center, 7 Defendant [ECF No.8] 8 9 10 Sarah Crebassabrings this actionand eight others alleging general and bizarre 11 grievances. Crebassawas given the opportunity to amend her original, single-page complaint, 12 but her amended complaint contains no plausible claims, just fantastic and delusional scenarios.1 13 So, after screening that amended pleading,Magistrate JudgeHoffman recommends that I dismiss 14 this case as delusional and frivolous.2 The deadline for objections to that recommendation 15 passed without objection or a request to extend the deadline to object. “[N]o review is required 16 of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”3 17 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 18 [ECF No. 8] is ADOPTEDin full; 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THATthis case is DISMISSED with prejudice as 20 delusional and fantastic. 21 22 1 ECF No. 7. 2 ECF No. 8. 23 3 Schmidt v. Johnstone,

263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226

(D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 150

(1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003). 1 The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. 2 Dated: August 7, 2019 ces US. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Reference

Status
Unknown