Ceasario v. Berryhill

District Court, D. Nevada

Ceasario v. Berryhill

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Sam Ceasario, Case No. 2:18-cv-00336-JAD-CWH 4 Plaintiff v. Order Adopting Report and 5 Recommendation Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of 6 Social Security Administration, [ECF Nos.18, 25, 27] 7 Defendant 8 9 Plaintiff Sam Ceasario brings this action to challenge the Social Security Commissioner’s 10 denial of his request for disability-insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The 11 magistrate judge has evaluated the briefing in this case and recommends that I deny Ceasario’s 12 motion to remandand grant the Commissioner’s cross-motion to affirm that decision.1 The 13 deadline for objections to that recommendation passed without objectionor any request to extend 14 the deadline to file one. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and 15 recommendation unless objections are filed.”2 16 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 17 [ECF No. 27]is ADOPTEDin full; 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Remand [ECF No. 18]is DENIED, and 19 the Cross-motion to Affirm [ECF No. 25] is GRANTED; 20 21 22 1 ECF No. 27. 23 2 Schmidt v. Johnstone,

263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226

(D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 150

(1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003). 1 The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS 2|| CASE. 3 Dated: August 14, 2019 nel EK US. District Judgeennifer orsey 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Reference

Status
Unknown