Bortolamedi v. Berryhill

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA Jacquelynn Bortolamedi, Case No. 2:17-cv-01473-JAD-BNW 4 Plaintiff v. Order Adopting Report and 5 Recommendation and Remanding Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of for Further Proceedings Social Security Administration, [ECF Nos.13, 18, 25] 7 Defendant 9 Plaintiff Jacquelynn Bortolamedi brings this action to challenge the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of herrequest for disability-insurance benefits under Titles IIand XVIof the Social Security Act. The magistrate judge has evaluated the briefing in this case and recommends1 that I grant in part and deny in part Bortolamedi’s motion for judgment on the pleadings2; remand this case for further proceedings regarding Drs. Hodde, Austin, and Madow’s opinions andthe vocational expert’s testimony; and deny the Commissioner’s cross-motion to affirm.3 The deadline for objections to that recommendation passed without objectionor any request to extend the deadline to file one. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”4 18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 25] is ADOPTEDin full; 1 ECF No. 25.

22 2 ECF No. 13.

3 ECF No. 18.

4 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for judgment on the pleadings 2|| [ECF No. 13] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in PART, consistent with the report and recommendation [ECF No. 25], and the Commissioner’ cross-motion to affirm [ECF No. 18] is DENIED. This case is REMANDED for further proceedings regarding Drs. Hodde, Austin, Madow’s opinions and the vocational expert’s testimony.

6 The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE.

8 Dated: September 17, 2019 : (Bom U.S. District Judge/Jennifer A. Dorsey