Jackson v. Oties
Jackson v. Oties
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA TREA ANDERSON JACKSON, Case No.: 2:18-cv-00735-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 6] DALE OTIES, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On September 6, 2019, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that I dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Trea Jackson failed to update her address and did not respond to court orders. ECF No. 6. Jackson did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring 12|| district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified 13}| proposed findings to which objection is made’’); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,
328 F.3d 1114, 1121(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and 17|| recommendation (ECF No. 6) is accepted and plaintiff Trea Jackson’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1) DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 26th day of September, 2019. 20 Se REWP. GORDON. 09 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
Reference
- Status
- Unknown