1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Lawrence Earl, Case No. 2:19-cv-01463-JAD-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Adopting Report and v. Recommendation and Dismissing State- 5 Law Claims and Fifth and Fourteenth City of Las Vegas Detention Center, et al., Amendment Claims 6 Defendants [ECF No. 4] 7 8 Lawrence Earl brings this civil-rights action to redress constitutional-rights violations that 9 he claims occurred in the course of his arrest and the search of his home.1 The magistrate judge 10 screened his claims, dismissed someof the federal claims with leave to amendand let others 11 proceed.2 She further recommends that I decline to exercise supplemental jurisdictionover 12 Earl’s additional state-law claims and that I dismiss his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due- 13 process claims with prejudice.3 The deadline to challenge that recommendation passed without 14 objectionor any request to extend the deadline to file one. “[N]o review is required of a 15 magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”4 Accordingly, for 16 the reasons stated in the report and recommendation, the Court declines to exercise supplemental 17 jurisdictionover plaintiff’s state-law claims and dismisses those claims alongwith his Fifth and 18 Fourteenth Amendment claims. 19 20 21 1 SeeScreening Order, ECF No. 3. 22 2 Id. 3 ECF No. 4. 23 4 Schmidt v. Johnstone,

(D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn,

(1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003). 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is 2| ADOPTED, plaintiff’s claims under Article III of the Nevada Constitution are DISMISSED without prejudice to his ability to file such claims in state court; and plaintiff’s 4) Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due-process claims are DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend. 6 Dated: November 16, 2019 coe U.S. District JudgeJennifer.A/ Dorsey 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23