Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3}| Robert J. Miller, Case No. 2:17-cv-02613-JAD-BNW 4 Plaintiff v. Order Adopting Report and 5 Recommendation, Denying Motion for Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Reversal and/or Remand, and Granting Social Security, Motion to Affirm 7 Defendant [ECF Nos. 18, 19, 22] 8 9 Plaintiff Robert J. Miller brings this action for review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for Social Security disability-insurance benefits. The magistrate judge has reviewed his case and recommends that I deny Miller’s motion for reversal and/or remand! and grant the Commissioner’ countermotion to affirm.” The deadline to 13]| challenge that recommendation? passed without objection or any request to extend the deadline 14} to file one. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless 15]| objections are filed.”* IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 16 . . . . e The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 22] is ADOPTED 17 in full; 18 e Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal and/or Remand [ECF No. 18] is DENIED; 19 e The Commissioner’s Cross-motion to Affirm [ECF No. 19] is GRANTED; and
20 211 ECF No. 18. 2 3 ECF No. 22. 4 Schmidt v. Johnstone,
263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226(D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 USS. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,
328 F.3d 1114, 1121(9th Cir. 2003).
e The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for the Defendant and 2 CLOSE THIS CASE. Dated: November 16, 2019 et 5 U.S. District JudgeJennifer4/ Dorsey
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Reference
- Status
- Unknown