Preciado-Nuno v. Baca
Trial Court Opinion
3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * EDWARD A. PRECIADO-NUNO, Case No. 3:19-cv-00103-HDM-WGC 7 Petitioner, v. ORDER ISIDRO BACA, et al., Respondents.
Before the Court is Respondents’ Motion for Leave to File Exhibits Under Seal (ECF No. 22). Respondents seek leave to file under seal one document in support of the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15) Petitioner Edward A. Preciado-Nuno’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 7): Exhibit 224, Petitioner’s Presentence Investigation Report (“PSI”) (ECF No. 23-1). Under Nevada law, the PSI is “confidential and must not be made a part of any public record.” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176.156(5).
Having reviewed and considered the matter in accordance with Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), and its progeny, the Court finds that a compelling need to protect Petitioner’s safety, privacy, and/or personal identifying information outweighs the public interest in open access to court records. /// /// 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 2 1. Respondents’ Motion for Leave to File Exhibits Under Seal 3 (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED.
4 2. Exhibit 224 (ECF No. 23-1) is considered properly filed 5 under seal.
6 Dated: November 22, 2019.
Lbvinl 9 ptt fr HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.