Williams v. Clark County

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA JAMES WILLIAMS, Case No.: 2:19-cv-01212-APG-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF No. 11] CLARK COUNTY, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On November 6, 2011, Magistrate Judge Youchah recommended that I dismiss this 9}| action because plaintiff James Williams did not file an amended complaint as ordered. ECF No. Williams did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).

16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Youchah’s report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 11) is accepted and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

18 DATED this 27th day of November, 2019.

19 ZA —— 20 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE