Virgil v. Hampton Court Westland LLC

District Court, D. Nevada

Virgil v. Hampton Court Westland LLC

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA Sandra Faye Virgil, Case No. 2:19-cv-01723-JAD-DJA 4 Plaintiff Vv. Order Adopting Report and 5 Recommendation and Dismissing Case Hampton Court Westland, LLC, 6 Defendant [ECF Nos. 1, 4] 7 8 9 Magistrate Judge Albregts has screened this action and found it “incomprehensible,” 10}| “factually frivolous,” and without a plausible claim, so he recommends that I dismiss it.! The 11} deadline for objections to that recommendation passed without objection or any request to extend the deadline to file one. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and 13|| recommendation unless objections are filed.”” 14 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 15}| [ECF No. 4] is ADOPTED in full; Virgil’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 1] is DENIED as moot. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this case is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY and CLOSE THIS CASE. 19 Dated: January 13, 2020 CL YY, 20 Cs )) be U.S. District Fudge JenniferA. Dorsey 21 22}; —__ ECF No. 4. Schmidt v. Johnstone,

263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226

(D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 150

(1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003).

Reference

Status
Unknown