1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 The Board of Trustees, in theircapacities as Case No.: 2:16-cv-00170-JAD-DJA Trustees of the National Roofing Industry 4 Pension Fund, et al., OrderDismissing and Closing Case 5 Plaintiffs and Directing Entry of Final Judgment v. 6 7 Lamar Von Noorda, et al., 8 Defendants 9 On August 27, 2019, I granted in part and denied in part a motion to voluntarily dismiss 10 this casebythe trustees of the National Roofing Industry Pension Fund and three other 11 employee-benefit funds (the Trusts)1 with furtherdirections.2 I explained that, “[w]hen the 12 court allows voluntary dismissal but rejects the proposed conditions, Rule 41(a)(2) provides the 13 plaintiff with ‘a reasonable period of time within which eitherto refuse the conditional voluntary 14 dismissal by withdrawing themotion for dismissal or to accept the dismissal despite the 15 imposition of conditions.’”3 I further explained that, “[t]o the extent that the Trusts have 16 conditioned their voluntary dismissal on the groundthat each party must pay their own attorneys’ 17 fees and costs,theTrusts have until September 6, 2019, to withdraw their request for voluntary 18 dismissal. Ifthey do not withdraw their voluntary dismissal by this deadline, the court will direct 19 20 1 The Trusts include the National Roofing Industry Pension Fund (Pension Fund), National 21 Roofers Union Health and Welfare Fund (Welfare Fund), Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund, and Roofers Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust Fund 22 Local 162 for Clark, Esmeralda, Lincoln & Southern Nye Counties. 2 ECF No. 84. 23 3 Id. (quotingBeard v. Sheet Metal Workers Union, Local 150,

(9th Cir. 1990) (internal quotation marks omitted)). the Clerk of Court to enter a judgment of dismissal on terms consistent with this order and close this case.””* 3 That September 6, 2019, deadline passed without any action by the Trusts or any other 4|| party to this case. Accordingly, with good cause appearing and no reason to delay, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL that states that final judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiffs and against defendants in the amount of $5,868.75 for the reasons stated in the court’s orders at ECF 8! Nos. 72 and 84, and CLOSE THIS CASE. 9 Dated: January 15, 2020

U.S. District (ods Jennifer). Dorsey 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 * Id. at 10-11 (emphasis deleted).