White v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA ROBERT WHITE, Case No.: 2:19-cv-00386-GMN-NJK Plaintiff(s), 12 ORDER [Docket No. 37] LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendant(s).

16 Pending before the Court is Defendant Shade Tree’s motion to stay discovery pending 17] resolution of its motion to dismiss. Docket No. 37; see also Docket No. 35 (motion to dismiss).

18]| Plaintiff has responded to the motion to dismiss, Docket No. 38, but has not responded to the 19] motion to stay discovery. Having reviewed the motion and applying the governing standards, see, e.g., Kor Media Grp. LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013), the Court finds that a stay of discovery is appropriate. Accordingly, the motion to stay discovery is GRANTED.

22 To be clear, this stay extends only to discovery involving Shade Tree and all other discovery shall proceed. See White v. Am. Tobacco Co., 125 F.R.D. 508, 510 (D. Nev. 1989).

24 IT IS SO ORDERED.

25 Dated: January 31, 2020 26 7 A : — a Nancy J. K 27 United States Magistrate Judge