District Court, D. Nevada, 2020

Howell v. Keast

Howell v. Keast
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided February 3, 2020
Howell v. Keast

Trial Court Opinion

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 * * * DAVID HOWELL, Case No. 3:18-cv-00273-MMD-WGC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants.

14 I. Discussion 15 On April 22, 2019, Plaintiff, who is a prisoner in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections (“NDOC”), filed a first amended civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 12). Plaintiff subsequently filed a motion to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 15). That motion did not include a complete complaint. It merely included language that purported to amend a cause of action. (Id.) Plaintiff is required to attach an amended complaint that is complete in and of itself without reference to the prior amendment. Nevada Local Rule of Practice LR 15-1. The Court therefore denies the motion to amend the complaint and grants Plaintiff leave to file a complete second amended complaint that includes the allegations from the motion to amend with the allegations from the first amended complaint. Plaintiff may not amend the first amended complaint to include factual allegations and defendants unrelated to the first amended complaint, and he may not include allegations regarding events that have taken place since he filed the first amended complaint; the Court will dismiss any such allegations.

2 complaint, Plaintiff shall file that second amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order. If Plaintiff chooses not to file a complete amended complaint, the Court will screen Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 12) only.

5 If Plaintiff chooses to file a complete second amended complaint, he is advised that an amended complaint supersedes (replaces) an earlier complaint and, thus, the second amended complaint must be complete in itself. See Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989). Plaintiff should file any second amended complaint on this Court’s approved prisoner civil rights form and it must be entitled “Second Amended Complaint.”

11 II. Conclusion 12 It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff’s motion to amend the first amended complaint (ECF No. 15) is denied with leave to file a second amended complaint as outlined in this order.

15 It is further ordered that, if Plaintiff chooses to file a second amended complaint, as outlined in this order, Plaintiff shall file the complete second amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order.

18 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall send to Plaintiff the approved form for filing a §1983 complaint, instructions for the same, a copy of his first amended complaint (ECF N o. 12), and a copy of his motion to amend the complaint (ECF No. 15). If Plaintiff chooses to file a second amended complaint, he should use the approved form and he shall write the words “Second Amended” above the words “Civil Rights Complaint” in the caption.

24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / thirty (30) days, the Court will screen Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 12) only.

3 DATED: February 3, 2020.

6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.