Isaharov v. Berryhill

District Court, D. Nevada

Isaharov v. Berryhill

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA TANYA LULU ISAHAROV, Case No.: 2:17-cv-01958-APG-WGC 4 Plaintiff Order (1) Accepting Report and Recommendation, (2) Denying Motion to SH v. Remand, and (3) Granting Motion to Affirm NANCY A. BERRYHILL, [ECF Nos. 15, 21, 32] 7 Defendant 8 On January 22, 2020, Magistrate Judge Cobb recommended that I deny plaintiff Tanya Isaharov’s motion to remand and grant the defendant’s motion to affirm. ECF No. 32. Isaharov 10}| did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 15}| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Cobb’s report and recommendation (ECF 17|| No. 32) is accepted, plaintiff Tanya Isaharov’s motion to remand (ECF No. 15) is DENIED, and defendant Nancy Berryhill’s motion to affirm (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED. The clerk of 19} court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of defendant Nancy Berryhill and against plaintiff 20] Tanya Isaharov. 21 DATED this 10th day of February, 2020. 22 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown