Doe v. Insurance Services Office, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada

Doe v. Insurance Services Office, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA JANE DOE, Case No.: 2:19-cv-01892-APG-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing SH v. Complaint With Prejudice INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC. and [ECF No. 4] GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants On February 3, 2020, Magistrate Judge Youchah recommended that I dismiss plaintiff ° Jane Doe’s complaint with prejudice. Doe did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Youchah’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 4) is accepted and plaintiff Jane Doe’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. DATED this 24th day of February, 2020. 19 Z a 20 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23

Reference

Status
Unknown