1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA ANTHONY J. BROOKS, Case No.: 3:19-cv-00457-APG-CLB 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation, Dismissing Complaint, v. and Denying Pending Motions as Moot JACQUELINE BRYANT, [ECF Nos. 3, 4, 7, 8, 14] 7 Defendant 8 On February 4, 2020, Magistrate Judge Baldwin recommended that plaintiff Anthony Brooks’ amended complaint be dismissed with prejudice and his other pending motions denied moot. Brooks did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation.

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Baldwin’s report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 14) is accepted, plaintiff Anthony Brooks’ amended complaint (ECF No. 12) is 18!) DISMISSED with prejudice, and all other pending motions (ECF Nos. 3, 4, 7, 8) are DENIED moot. The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case. 20 DATED this 24th day of February, 2020. 21 22 ANDREW P. GORDON 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE