District Court, D. Nevada, 2020

Price v. Saul

Price v. Saul
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided March 11, 2020
Price v. Saul

Trial Court Opinion

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA TYRONE D. PRICE, Case No.: 2:20-cv-00488-DJA 10 Plaintiff, Screening Order v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant.

15 Plaintiff has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) and has submitted a Complaint (ECF No. 1-2).

17 I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 18 Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1). The application has sufficiently shown an inability to prepay fees and costs or give security for them. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted pursuant to § 1915. The Court will now review Plaintiff’s complaint.

22 II. Screening the Complaint 23 When a party seeks permission to pursue a civil case in forma pauperis, courts will screen the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). With respect to social security appeals specifically, judges in this District have outlined some basic requirements for complaints to satisfy the Court’s screening. First, the complaint must establish that administrative remedies were exhausted pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and that the civil action was commenced within 60 days after notice of a final decision. Second, the complaint must indicate the judicial district in which the plaintiff resides. Third, the complaint must state the nature of the plaintiff’s disability and when the plaintiff claims to have become disabled. Fourth, the complaint must contain a plain, short, and concise statement identifying the nature of the plaintiff’s disagreement with the determination made by the Social Security Administration and show that the plaintiff is entitled to relief. See, e.g., Graves v. Colvin, 2015 WL 357121, *2 (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2015) (collecting cases). The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s complaint, and finds these elements have been pled here.

7 III. Conclusion 8 Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 9 1. Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED with the caveat that the 10 fees shall be paid if recovery is made. At this time, Plaintiff shall not be required to 11 pre-pay the filing fee.

12 2. Plaintiff is permitted to maintain this action to conclusion without the necessity of 13 prepayment of any additional fees or costs or the giving of a security therefor. The 14 Order granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis shall not extend to the issuance of 15 subpoenas at government expense.

16 3. The Clerk of Court shall file the Complaint.

17 4. The Clerk of Court shall serve the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration 18 by sending a copy of the summons and Complaint by certified mail to: (1) Office of 19 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, Social Security Administration, 160 Spear St., 20 Suite 899, San Francisco, California 94105-1545; and (2) the Attorney General of the 21 United States, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 4400, 22 Washington, D.C. 20530.

23 5. The Clerk of Court shall issue summons to the United States Attorney for the District 24 of Nevada and deliver the summons and Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service.

25 6. From this point forward, Plaintiff shall serve upon Defendant or, if appearance has been 26 entered by counsel, upon the attorney, a copy of every pleading, motion or other 27 document submitted for consideration by the court. Plaintiff shall include with the 28 original paper submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct 1 copy of the document was personally served or sent by mail to the defendants or 2 counsel for the defendants. The court may disregard any paper received by a district 3 judge or magistrate judge which has not been filed with the Clerk, and any paper 4 received by a district judge, magistrate judge or the Clerk which fails to include a 5 certificate of service.

6 IT IS SO ORDERED.

7 Dated: March 11, 2020 8 ______________________________ Daniel J. Albregts 9 United States Magistrate Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.