Broughton v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, D. Nevada

Broughton v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Talitha Broughton, Case No. 2:18-cv-02188-JAD-EJY

5 Plaintiff v. Order Adopting Report and 6 Recommendation, Denying Motion for Remand, and Granting Andrew Saul, Acting Commissioner of Social Cross-Motion to Affirm 7 Security,

8 Defendant [ECF Nos. 14, 17, 22]

9

10 Talitha Broughton brings this action to review the Commissioner of Social Security’s 11 denial of her application for disability-insurance benefits. Having thoughtfully considered 12 Broughton’s motion to remand and the Commissioner’s cross-motion to affirm in a 25-page 13 report and recommendation, Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah recommends that I deny 14 Broughton’s motion to remand and grant the Commissioner’s cross-motion.1 The deadline for 15 objections to that recommendation has passed, and no party has filed an objection to it or moved 16 to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and 17 recommendation unless objections are filed.”2 18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 19 [ECF No. 22] is ADOPTED in full; 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for reversal or remand [ECF No. 14] 21 is DENIED and the Commissioner’s cross-motion to affirm [ECF No. 17] is GRANTED. The 22 1 ECF No. 22. 23 2 Schmidt v. Johnstone,

263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226

(D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 150

(1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003). 1}| decision below is AFFIRMED, and with good cause appearing and no reason to delay, the Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER FINAL JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE. 3 Dated: March 20, 2020 15 asc as ; USS. District Judge Jen ‘tek A. Dorsey

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Reference

Status
Unknown