Ricci v. Duran

District Court, D. Nevada

Ricci v. Duran

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Joseph Ricci, Case No.: 2:19-cv-00415-JAD-VCF 4 Plaintiff 5 v. Order 6 Duran et al., [ECF No. 13-1] 7 Defendants 8 9 On February 9, 2020, I dismissed Plaintiff Joseph Ricci’s complaint and granted him 10 leave to file a first-amended complaint by March 11, 2020.1 I warned Ricci that if he did not file 11 an amended complaint by that date, I would dismiss the case with prejudice for failure to state a 12 claim and close the case.2 After no response from Ricci, I dismissed the case with prejudice for 13 failure to state a claim on March 24, 2020.3 The Clerk of the Court entered judgment the same 14 day.4 15 On April 7, 2020, Ricci submitted a letter explainingthat he never received myscreening 16 order from February 9, 2020.5 The Clerk of the Court sent Ricci a minute order stating that Ricci 17 must style requests to the court in a motion rather than in a letter.6 18 19 20 1 ECF No. 9 at 8–9. 21 2 Id.at 9. 3 ECF No. 11. 22 4 ECF No. 12. 23 5 ECF No. 13-1. 6 ECF No. 13. 1 I now direct the Clerk of the Court to send Ricci a copy of my screening order.’ If Ricci able to cure the deficiencies of his complaint that are explained in the screening order, he should file a motion for reconsideration explaining why he did not respond to my screening order 4) and should attach a proposed first-amended complaint to the motion that cures the complaint’ □ 5]| deficiencies.* Ricci must file his motion for reconsideration and proposed first-amended 6|| complaint by Friday, May 15, 2020. 7 Conclusion 8 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to SEND Ricci copy of my screening order (ECF No. 9), a copy of Ricci’s original complaint (ECF No. 10), the approved form for filing a § 1983 prisoner complaint, and instructions for the same. 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Ricci chooses to file a motion for reconsideration 12} and attach a proposed first-amended complaint, Ricci must file those documents by Friday, May 13]| 15, 2020, or this case will remain closed without any further reconsideration. 14 Dated: April 9, 2020 oem oH — U.S. District Judge 16 17 18 19]|7 ECF No. 9. 8 Ricci should take note of the following law: A motion to reconsider must set forth “some valid 20 oe oy « reason why the court should reconsider its prior decision” and set “forth facts or law of a 1 strongly convincing nature to persuade the court to reverse its prior decision.” Frasure v. United States,

256 F. Supp. 2d 1180, 1183

(D. Nev. 2003). Reconsideration is appropriate if this Court “(1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial 22 . □ □ . : . . decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law.” Sch. 3 Dist. No. 1J v. Acands, Inc.,

5 F.3d 1255

, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993). “A motion for reconsideration is not an avenue to re-litigate the same issues and arguments upon which the court already has ruled.” Brown v. Kinross Gold, U.S.A.,

378 F. Supp. 2d 1280, 1288

(D. Nev. 2005).

Reference

Status
Unknown