Trevino v. Henderson Police Department

District Court, D. Nevada

Trevino v. Henderson Police Department

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA CHRISTOPHER TREVINO, Case No.: 2:20-cv-00215-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 5] HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, 7 Defendant 8 On March 19, 2020, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that I dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Christopher Trevino did not pay the filing fee or file an 10} application to proceed in forma pauperis by the March 5, 2020 deadline he was given. ECF 5. Trevino did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which 14} objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 5) is accepted and plaintiff Christopher Trevino’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is 19|| dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 20 DATED this 10th day of April, 2020. 21 22 ANDREW P. GORDON 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown