1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 * * *

9 VICTOR TAGLE, SR., Case No. 2:20-cv-00204-RFB-BNW

10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v.

12 BANK OF AMERICA, et al.,

13 Defendants.

14 15 16 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable 17 Brenda N. Weksler, United States Magistrate Judge, entered March 19, 2020. ECF No. 8. 18 A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 19 recommendations made by the magistrate.”

(b)(1). A party may file specific 20 written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge.

636(b)(1); D. Nev. Civ. R. IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is 22 required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed 23 findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”

(b)(1); see also D. Nev. 24 Civ. R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct 25 “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 26 Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due 27 by April 2, 2020. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case 28 and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 8) is 2 | ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Victor Tagle, Sr.’s case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 5 The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. 6 7 DATED: April 16, 2020. 8 RICHAR ARE, IT 9 United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

_2-