1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 * * *

9 SYLVANIUS BELL, Case No. 2:19-cv-01492-RFB-NJK

10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v.

12 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION STATE OF NEVADA, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable 16 Nancy J. Koppe, United States Magistrate Judge, entered April 3, 2020. ECF No. 18. 17 A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 18 recommendations made by the magistrate.”

(b)(1). A party may file specific 19 written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge.

636(b)(1); D. Nev. Civ. R. IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is 21 required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed 22 findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”

(b)(1); see also D. Nev. 23 Civ. R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct 24 “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 25 Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due 26 by April 17, 2020. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case 27 and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. 28 . . . 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 18) is 2 | ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 4 The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. 5 □□ DATED: April 22, 2020. 4s oa {i 7 RICHANQE. SOULWARE, II 8 United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

_2-