Williams v. Clark County

District Court, D. Nevada

Williams v. Clark County

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA JAMES WILLIAMS, Case No.: 2:19-cv-01212-APG-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Denying Motion to v. Amend CLARK COUNTY, et al., [ECF Nos. 14, 15] 7 Defendants 8 On April 8, 2020, Magistrate Judge Youchah recommended that I deny plaintiff James 9}| Williams’ motion to amend or correct the judgment because he does not state a basis for relief under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59 or 60. Williams did not file an objection. Thus, I am obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made’); United States v. Reyna- Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the 15}| magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Judge Youchah’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 15) is accepted and plaintiff James Williams’ motion to alter/amend the order accepting the report and recommendation and dismissing the complaint (ECF No. 14) is DENIED. 20 DATED this 28th day of April, 2020. 21 Z : 22 ANDREW P. GORDON 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown