District Court, D. Nevada, 2020

Jacobson v. Commissioner of the Social Security

Jacobson v. Commissioner of the Social Security
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided May 7, 2020
Jacobson v. Commissioner of the Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case No.: 2:19-cv-0432-JAD-EJY Christin Jacobson, 5 Plaintiff v. Order Adopting Report & Recommendation Andrew Saul, Acting Commissioner of Social and Dismissing Case Security, Defendant [ECF No.25] 11 Christin Jacobsonbrought this action to challenge the outcome of her Social Security disability case but failed to file a motion for remand or any motion requesting relief. The magistrate judge ordered her to show cause why this case should not be dismissed due to this omission1 and now recommends that I dismiss this action because, despite clear instructions and numerous opportunities to file an appropriate motion for relief, Jacobson has failed to do so.2 The deadline for Jacobsonto object to that recommendation expired with no objection or request to extend the deadline to file one. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”3 Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do.

20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 25] is ADOPTED in its entirety.

1 ECF No. 22 (OSC).

2 ECF No. 17 (order directing motion by11/21/2019), ECF No. 24 (order directing motion by 4/1/2020),ECF No. 25 (R&R).

3 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 27 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is || directed to ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY and CLOSE THIS CASE.

4 Dated: May 7, 2020 ‘ US. District J Idee Jehnifer A. Dorsey

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.